Tag Archives: security

Generator Labs: Blacklist and Certificate Monitoring for Email and Infrastructure Teams

Generator Labs provides infrastructure monitoring for teams that need to stay ahead of two specific problems: IP and domain blacklistings that kill email deliverability, and SSL certificates that expire without warning. Both products run in the same portal, so you manage everything in one place.

Blacklist Monitoring

Blacklist monitoring runs continuous checks of your IPv4 addresses, IPv6 addresses, and domains against hundreds of RBL and URIBL data sources. The moment a listing is detected, alerts go out through whatever channels you have configured: email, SMS, Slack, Discord, PagerDuty, or webhooks.

Coverage is the differentiator. Free one-shot tools check a handful of the major lists. Generator Labs checks well over a hundred data sources on a schedule, including 30+ premium sources on Enterprise and Ultimate plans that free tools do not cover. You get notified when something changes; you are not logging in to run a manual check.

Other features worth knowing:

Full IPv6 support. IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are both monitored across all plans. As more mail infrastructure goes dual-stack, IPv6 blacklisting is a real and growing issue that most monitoring tools still treat as secondary.

Shareable public reports. Every monitored host gets a public report URL you can hand to a client, ISP, or manager without giving anyone portal access.

REST API. Full programmatic access to monitoring data and controls, with client libraries for PHP, Node.js, and Python.

Generator Labs RBL Monitoring hosts list

Blacklist Monitoring Pricing

  • Free: 1 host, 48-hour check interval, 100+ data sources. Free forever, no credit card required.
  • Professional: $8/month for 20 hosts at 24-hour intervals.
  • Enterprise: $16/month for 50 hosts at 12-hour intervals, premium data sources, custom run times.
  • Ultimate: $0.005 per check, unlimited hosts, custom intervals, all premium sources.

The Ultimate pay-per-check plan scales cleanly for larger deployments. Running 50 hosts daily against 150 data sources works out to roughly $11/month.

Certificate Monitoring

Certificate monitoring tracks SSL/TLS certificate expirations across your domains and sends alerts before anything expires. Add your domains, set alert thresholds, and the service runs automatically from there.

Both publicly-trusted and private or internal CA certificates are supported, which matters for teams running internal infrastructure that does not go through a public CA. Certificate expiry causes outages that are entirely preventable; automated monitoring removes the spreadsheet tracking and calendar reminders that most teams fall back on.

Generator Labs Certificate Monitoring monitors list

Monitoring profiles let you define reusable alert configurations across multiple monitors. Set custom expiration alert windows (5, 15, 30, 60 days, or any combination you need), choose which failure types trigger alerts, and assign private CAs or internal monitoring agents. One profile can cover dozens of monitors.

Generator Labs Certificate Monitoring add profile dialog

Certificate Monitoring Pricing

Certificate monitoring is priced at $0.01 per host per day, with no fixed tiers. You pay for what you monitor and can add or remove domains at any time.

Who It Is For

  • Email service providers and hosting companies monitoring large IP ranges
  • IT and security teams who need immediate notification when a host gets listed
  • Organizations managing many domains who need certificate expiry visibility without manual tracking
  • Developers who want API access to monitoring data for automation or integration

Get Started

Generator Labs offers continuous blacklist monitoring and certificate monitoring with solid alert coverage and a complete API. The free tier is a real free tier. Sign up at portal.generatorlabs.com to get started, no credit card required.

What Is DMARC and Why Is It Important?

Originally Posted on the Generator Labs Blacklist Monitoring Blog.

DMARC, or “Domain-Based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance”, allows a domain owner to publish policies in DNS, telling remote mailers what to do with messages that do not align with these polices. DMARC is built on top of two existing technologies: SPF, or “Sender Policy Framework”, and DKIM, or “DomainKeys Identified Mail”.

By publishing a DMARC policy via DNS, domain owners can instruct remote mailers on what to do with messages that do not pass either a SPF or DKIM test. It also provides a mechanism for reporting under those policies. This gives remote mailers a channel for letting domain owners know that they received messages that did or did not align with those policies.

Why Is This Good?

The main goal of DMARC (and SPF and DKIM), is to detect and prevent email spoofing. For example, phishing scams that are designed to look like they’re coming from your bank or Paypal, prompting you to click on a link to reset your password or to give them your information.

Ultimately, SPF and DKIM are doing the hard work here. By designating email systems that are permitted to send email for a domain, and by cryptographically signing messages to avoid header modification en-route.

But DMARC ties the two technologies together, providing a single interface for instructing remote mailers on the domains policies, and actions to take when not met. It also opens up the possibilities of adding additional anti-spoofing or SPAM control software, which could also be handled under the DMARC umbrella.

For Example

As a domain owner of example.com, I can publish both SPF and DKIM records identifying my mail system (x.x.x.x) as the only authorized mail relay for my domain. I can then publish a DMARC record that tells remote mailers, that they should reject any messages that do not pass both a SPF and DKIM check, and that they should send reports to abuse@example.com to let me know if and when this happens.

A DMARC policy record, via a DNS TXT record, using the hostname _dmarc.example.com, would look something like this:

"v=DMARC1;p=reject;rua=mailto:abuse@example.com"

If a remote mail receives an inbound email from an email address @example.com, but not from my mail system (x.x.x.x), the SPF check should fail, and they should reject the email in accordance with my DMARC policy.

Technologies like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM are great tools in the seemingly never ending fight against email SPAM and spoofing.

For more information, see: