<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: memcached (and facebook)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikepultz.com/2008/12/memcached-and-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikepultz.com/2008/12/memcached-and-facebook/</link>
	<description>personal and professional blog of mike pultz, technology specialist and serial entrepreneur.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 19:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://mikepultz.com/2008/12/memcached-and-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikepultz.com/?p=29#comment-5</guid>
		<description>A couple of weeks ago I got an invitation from a friend (who I already know on Facebook, and in real time, real life!) for Reunion.com. I didn&#039;t look into the invite or the site since I felt I wasn&#039;t quite ready to jump Facebook ship. Maybe it&#039;s the apps that actually keep Facebook fresh. That is to say, even if Facebook plateaus, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ll have at the same time. Of course, if the trend is to abandon the site in favour for another, then I would have to follow suit. That is the trick of social networking sites: keeping those people there. I know many were disappointed with the Facebook redesign launched a few months ago. I think the use of apps actually suffered because of it, which is the counter-argument of what I mentioned earlier about keeping Facebook fresh. Time will tell. 

What I wonder is, if the next social networking trend is really not about social networking anymore. Maybe the plateau really isn&#039;t about a &quot;reunion&quot; but an &quot;un-union.&quot; Maybe the next &quot;web community&quot; created will be based around detaching from acquaintances or associations made in other social networking sites, so the individual cannot &quot;search&quot; you out in other places when excluded from one. Sinister, but from behind the screen, un-social networking is very easy to do....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago I got an invitation from a friend (who I already know on Facebook, and in real time, real life!) for Reunion.com. I didn&#8217;t look into the invite or the site since I felt I wasn&#8217;t quite ready to jump Facebook ship. Maybe it&#8217;s the apps that actually keep Facebook fresh. That is to say, even if Facebook plateaus, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ll have at the same time. Of course, if the trend is to abandon the site in favour for another, then I would have to follow suit. That is the trick of social networking sites: keeping those people there. I know many were disappointed with the Facebook redesign launched a few months ago. I think the use of apps actually suffered because of it, which is the counter-argument of what I mentioned earlier about keeping Facebook fresh. Time will tell. </p>
<p>What I wonder is, if the next social networking trend is really not about social networking anymore. Maybe the plateau really isn&#8217;t about a &#8220;reunion&#8221; but an &#8220;un-union.&#8221; Maybe the next &#8220;web community&#8221; created will be based around detaching from acquaintances or associations made in other social networking sites, so the individual cannot &#8220;search&#8221; you out in other places when excluded from one. Sinister, but from behind the screen, un-social networking is very easy to do&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

